Academic integrity is expected of all faculty, staff and students in order to promote a productive and safe environment for learning. Key components of academic integrity are communication and mutual respect among the members of the Samuel Merritt University community. Faculty, staff, and students are expected to abide by the codes of conduct and ethics of this University, as well as, the code of ethics of their respective professions, which includes reporting misconduct to the appropriate authorities. Lack of academic integrity includes, but is not limited to, plagiarizing, cheating, deception, breach of confidentiality, failure to report a clinical error, falsifying research results, and failure to confront and/or report misconduct of others.
Faculty members reserve the right to evaluate individual cases of academic dishonesty by a student and to take appropriate action, which may include failure on a paper or exam or failure in the course. Faculty may also recommend censure, probation, suspension or dismissal to the Academic Vice President. A written report of any action will be placed in the student’s file in the Office of the Registrar. If the student’s status in the program is affected, a permanent notation will be made on his/her transcript.
Regardless of any action taken by the course faculty member, lack of academic integrity constitutes grounds for suspension or dismissal from Samuel Merritt University through the Office of the Academic Vice President.
Faculty and staff standards of conduct and consequences are delineated in the Faculty-Staff Handbook.
Students enrolled at Samuel Merritt University assume an obligation to conduct themselves in a manner compatible with the philosophy of the institution, the codes of ethics, and California laws and regulations pertaining to their respective professions. Behaviors for which students are subject to discipline include but are not limited to the following categories:
- Violation of University policies;
- Dishonesty, including but not limited to, cheating, plagiarism, forgery, alterations, or misuse of University documents or records;
- Obstruction or disruption of teaching, research, administration, disciplinary procedures, or other authorized University activities, including clinical experiences;
- Physical, verbal, or written abuse or intimidation of any person, implicit or explicit, or endangering the health or safety of any person;
- Theft of or damage to physical or intellectual property belonging to the University or to a member of the University community or a campus visitor;
- Unauthorized entry, access, or use of University facilities;
- Failure to comply with directions of University officials acting in the performance of their duties, including the reasonable request for students to identify themselves;
- Possession or use of weapons, firearms or explosive devices of any description (see “Weapons” policy, Campus Policies);
- Violations of policy on alcoholic beverages and illegal substances;
- Failure to conform with stated institutional policies and procedures;
- Misrepresentation of the University and/or its policies and philosophy;
- Behavior that seriously jeopardizes the safety of others;
- Violation of California laws and regulations;
- Violation of codes of ethics and standards of practice for the respective professions.
We, the faculty, staff, and students of Samuel Merritt University, share the conviction that the interactions among ourselves and between us and our community are founded in mutual trust, respect, and consideration. We are dedicated to a code of ethics which sets forth moral principles for positive human interaction.
- We agree to be trustworthy.
- We agree to be just in our evaluations and decisions.
- We agree to respect human dignity and cultural and personal differences among people, and to be sensitive to these in our respective roles.
- We support individuals’ rights to autonomy and to pursue their own life decisions as long as they do not infringe upon the rights of others.
- We agree to be accountable for our decisions and actions, and for our roles and interactions among others.
- We are committed to life-long learning, continual self-assessment, and the conscientious and diligent pursuit of excellence in our respective fields.
- We believe in working together as a team toward the common good and for academic purposes.
- We observe the confidentiality of information and records in our charge.
- We agree to abide by the written standards and codes of ethics and conduct of our respective professions.
There are related policies and procedures which expand the Code of Ethics. Some of these include the codes of ethics and standards of practice for the respective professions, the Academic Integrity Policy and the Student Code of Conduct, faculty and staff personnel policies (published in the Faculty-Staff Handbook), and individual departmental policies and handbooks.
Critical Behaviors, which if proven can immediately result in failure of the course, as well as disciplinary action by the University:
Purposeful falsification of a client’s record.
Denying responsibility for one’s own deviation from standard practice
Act or threat of intimidation, harassment or physical aggression
Actions which place the client or others in physical or emotional jeopardy
Abusive behavior toward clients or others
Failure to disclose actions, which place the client or others in physical or emotional jeopardy
Ignoring the need for essential information before intervening.
Disclosures/Truth in Information - Refer to the policy in the Academic Policies section.
- The Student Grievance Committee (SGC) is a standing committee of the Faculty Organization. The Committee will consist of two faculty members from the School of Nursing, and one faculty member from each additional school or department. These faculty members shall be nominated by their departments and selected by the President of the Faculty Organization. There shall be one student for every 100 enrolled from each School or Department (nominated by the Student Body Association (SBA) and appointed by the Division of Enrollment and Student Services). There shall be three staff members on the Committee, two from Enrollment and Student Services and one from Business Affairs. Staff members will be appointed by the Vice President of Enrollment and Student Services and Finance and Administration. The SCG Chair, selected from members of the Committee, will hold a faculty appointment. For each grievance review, the membership will include the Chair, two faculty, one staff, and one student.
- In the event that the appointed members of the SGC cannot be convened, the President of the Faculty Organization may convene a committee consisting of a minimum of three, based on the nature of the grievance. The President of the Faculty Organization may exercise the right to appoint other representatives as necessary.
- The meeting shall be closed to the public and only the grievant(s), members of the Committee, the person whose decision is being grieved, and other individuals approved by the SGC Chair, shall be present. Staff in the Office of Student Services may serve as a student resource during the grievance process; however they are not voting members of the Committee.
- The SGC Chair has full operational authority to plan and conduct the meeting as they determine.
- In the case of grievances or allegations involving more than one grievant, the SGC Chair has the discretion to convene one meeting for all parties concerned or a separate one for each person.
- Committee deliberations will only be open to members of the SGC.
- Formal rules of evidence shall not be in effect. No attorney, who represents any of the involved parties, shall attend or take part in the meeting.
- Any and all written records of the proceedings shall be forwarded to the appropriate Vice President’s office after the hearing and archived. There will be no recording devices allowed during the grievance proceedings.
- All relevant information from the review will be kept in confidence, in accordance with the federal Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) or other applicable federal law.
Note: The timelines specified in this policy may be extended due to extenuating or extraordinary circumstances, with the approval of the appropriate Vice President.
USE AND ADAPTATION OF THIS MODEL WITH CITATION TO THE NCHERM GROUP/ATIXA Is PERMITTED THROUGH A LICENSE TO SAMUEL MERRITT UNIVERSITY ALL OTHER RIGHTS RESERVED. ©2015. THE NCHERM GROUP, LLC/ATIXA
Samuel Merritt University affirms its commitment to promote the goals of fairness and equity in all aspects of the educational enterprise. All policies below are subject to resolution using University’s resolution process, as detailed below. This process is applicable regardless of the status of the parties involved, who may be members or non-members of the campus community, students, student organizations, faculty, administrators and/or staff. University reserves the right to act on incidents occurring on-campus or off-campus, when the off-campus conduct could have an on-campus impact or impact on the educational mission of University.
The Executive Director for Office of People and Culture, Eva Hilliard, serves as the Title IX Coordinator and oversees implementation of the University’s policy on equal opportunity, harassment and nondiscrimination. Reports of discrimination, harassment and/or retaliation should be made to the ITitle IX Coordinator or deputy promptly, but there is no time limitation on the filing of the complaint, as long as the responding party remains subject to University’s jurisdiction. All reports are acted upon promptly while every effort is made by the University to preserve the privacy of reports. Anonymous reports may also be filed. Reporting is addressed more specifically on Number 7, below. In the event of a conflict of interest involving the Title IX Coordinator or to make reports of discrimination by the Title IX Coordinator, please contact the University President Ching Wang at 510.879-9270
This policy applies to behaviors that take place on the campus, at University-sponsored events and may also apply off-campus and to actions online when the Title IX Coordinator determines that the off-campus conduct affects a substantial University interest. A substantial University interest is defined to include:
- Any action that constitutes criminal offense as defined by federal or state law. This includes, but is not limited to, single or repeat violations of any local, state or federal law committed in the municipality where University is located;
- Any situation where it appears that the responding party may present a danger or threat to the health or safety of self or others;
- Any situation that significantly impinges upon the rights, property or achievements of self or others or significantly breaches the peace and/or causes social disorder; and/or
- Any situation that is detrimental to the educational interests of the University.
University: Any online postings or other electronic communication by students, including cyber-bullying, cyber-stalking, cyber-harassment, etc. occurring completely outside of University’s control (e.g. not on University networks, websites or between University email accounts) will only be subject to this policy when those online behaviors can be shown to cause a substantial University disruption. Otherwise, such communications are considered speech protected by the 1stAmendment.
Off-campus discriminatory or harassing speech by employees may be regulated by the University only when such speech is made in an employee’s official or work-related capacity.
Inquiries about this policy and procedure may be made internally to:
Executive Director for Office of People and Culture
Samuel Merritt University
3100 Telegraph Avenue, Suite 1000
Oakland, CA 94609
510.879.9200 x 3597
Inquiries may be made externally to:
Office for Civil Rights (OCR)
U.S. Department of Education
400 Maryland Avenue, SW
Washington, DC 20202-1100
Customer Service Hotline #: (800) 421-3481
Facsimile: (202) 453-6012
TDD#: (877) 521-2172
San Francisco Office
U.S. Department of Education
50 Beale Street, Suite 7200
San Francisco, CA 94105-1813
Telephone: (415) 486-5555
Facsimile: (415) 486-5570
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)
1. University Policy on Nondiscrimination
University adheres to all federal and state civil rights laws banning discrimination in public institutions of higher education. Samuel Merritt University will not discriminate against any employee, applicant for employment, student or applicant for admission on the basis of race, religion, color, sex, pregnancy, ethnicity, national origin (including ancestry), citizenship status, familial status, disability, age, sexual orientation, gender, gender identity, veteran or military status (including special disabled veteran, Vietnam-era veteran, or recently separated veteran), predisposing genetic characteristics or any other protected category under applicable local, state or federal law, including protections for those opposing discrimination or participating in any resolution process within the University or within the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission or other human rights agencies.
This policy covers nondiscrimination in employment and in access to educational opportunities. Therefore, any member of the campus community, guest or visitor who acts to deny, deprive or limit the educational, employment, residential and/or social access, benefits and/or opportunities of any member of the campus community on the basis of their actual or perceived membership in the protected classes listed above is in violation of University policy on nondiscrimination. When brought to the attention of University, any such discrimination will be appropriately remedied by University according to the procedures below.
2. University Policy on Accommodation of Disabilities
University is committed to full compliance with the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, which prohibit discrimination against qualified persons with disabilities, as well as other federal and state laws pertaining to individuals with disabilities. Under the ADA and its amendments, a person has a disability if he or she has a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits a major life activity. The ADA also protects individuals who have a record of a substantially limiting impairment or who are regarded as disabled by the institution whether qualified or not. A substantial impairment is one that significantly limits or restricts a major life activity such as hearing, seeing, speaking, breathing, performing manual tasks, walking or caring for oneself.
The Director of the Disability Resource Center (for students) and the Interim Director of Human Resources (for employees) have been designated as the ADA/504 Coordinator responsible for coordinating efforts to comply with these disability laws, including investigation of any complaint alleging noncompliance.
a. Students with Disabilities
University is committed to providing qualified students with disabilities with reasonable accommodations and support needed to ensure equal access to the academic programs and activities of University.
All accommodations are made on a case-by-case basis. A student requesting any accommodation should first contact the Director of the Disability Resource Center who coordinates services for students with disabilities. The Director reviews documentation provided by the student and, in consultation with the student, determines which accommodations are appropriate to the student’s particular needs and academic programs.
b. Employees with Disabilities
Pursuant to the ADA, University will provide reasonable accommodation(s) to all qualified employees with known disabilities, where their disability affects the performance of their essential job functions, except where doing so would be unduly disruptive or would result in undue hardship.
An employee with a disability is responsible for requesting an accommodation in writing to Executive Director for Human Resources and provide appropriate documentation. The Executive Director for Human Resources will work with the employee’s supervisor to identify which essential functions of the position are affected by the employee’s disability and what reasonable accommodations could enable the employee to perform those duties.
3. University Policy on Discriminatory Harassment
Students, staff, administrators, and faculty are entitled to a working environment and educational environment free of discriminatory harassment. University’s harassment policy is not meant to inhibit or prohibit educational content or discussions inside or outside of the classroom that include germane, but controversial or sensitive subject matters protected by academic freedom. The sections below describe the specific forms of legally prohibited harassment that are also prohibited under University policy.
a. Discriminatory and Bias-Related Harassment
Harassment constitutes a form of discrimination that is prohibited by law. University will remedy all forms of harassment when reported, whether or not the harassment rises to the level of creating a hostile environment. When harassment rises to the level of creating a hostile environment, University may also impose sanctions on the harasser. University’s harassment policy explicitly prohibits any form of harassment, defined as unwelcome conduct on the basis of actual or perceived membership in a protected class, by any member or group of the community.
A hostile environment may be created by verbal, written, graphic, or physical conduct that is sufficiently severe or persistent/pervasive and objectively offensive that it interferes with, limits or denies the ability of an individual to participate in or benefit from educational programs or activities or employment access, benefits or opportunities.
Offensive conduct and/or harassment that does not rise to the level of discrimination or that is of a generic nature not on the basis of a protected status may not result in the imposition of discipline under University policy, but will be addressed through civil confrontation, remedial actions, education and/or effective conflict resolution mechanisms. For assistance with conflict resolution techniques, contact the Title IX Coordinator.
University condemns and will not tolerate discriminatory harassment against any employee, student, visitor or guest on the basis of any status protected by University policy or law.
b. Sexual Harassment
Both the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and the State of California regard sexual harassment as a form of sex/gender discrimination and, therefore, as an unlawful discriminatory practice. University has adopted the following definition of sexual harassment, in order to address the special environment of an academic community, which consists not only of employer and employees, but of students as well.
Sexual harassment is:
- unwelcome, sexual or gender-based verbal, written, online and/or physical conduct.
Anyone experiencing sexual harassment in any University program is encouraged to report it immediately to the Title IX Coordinator.
Sexual harassment creates a hostile environment, and may be disciplined when it is:
- sufficiently severe, persistent/pervasive and objectively offensive that it,
- has the effect of unreasonably interfering with, denying or limiting employment opportunities or the ability to participate in or benefit from the University’s educational, social and/or residential program, and is
- based on power differentials (quid pro quo), the creation of a hostile environment or retaliation.
The prohibition on sexual harassment applies to all staff employees and students, and in particular to supervisors (including direct supervisory and other management staff). A sexual advance violates this policy regardless of whether the advance is expressly related to the affected employee’s/student’s employment/academic status. It is improper to make sexual advances, ask for, demand or seek by subtle pressure sexual favors or activity from an employee/student, or to subject another employee/student to verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature where:
- The submission to such behavior is a condition of any employment/academic opportunity, benefit, job retention, grade; or
- The submission to or rejection of such conduct is used as a basis for employment/academic decisions;
- It is improper for an employee/student to make sexual advances or to offer or suggest sexual favors or activity in exchange or in consideration for any personnel/academic action.
- It is improper to retaliate against an employee/student for refusing a sexual advance or for refusing a request, demand or pressure for sexual favors or activity or to retaliate against an employee/student who has reported an incident of possible sexual harassment to the University or to any government agency.
- Due to the possibility of misinterpretation of acts by other employees/students, the University discourages all roughhousing or physical contact, except that contact necessary and incidental to an employee’s job/student’s academic status. Further, certain kinds of physical conduct in the work/academic environment are particularly inappropriate and may be grounds for immediate discipline, including dismissal from the University. That conduct includes, but is not limited to:
- Kissing or attempting to kiss an employee/student;
- Touching or attempting to touch or pretending to touch the breasts, buttocks or genitals of an employee/student;
- Physically restraining by force or blocking the path of an employee/student when accompanied by other conduct of a sexual nature;
- Any other touching or attempted touching reasonably interpreted to be of a sexual nature.
- Sexual advances, unwelcome requests, demands, or subtle pressure for sexual favors or activity, lewd comments and sexual innuendoes are also prohibited. This conduct includes, but is not limited to:
- Comments to an employee/student or others about the body of an employee/student which are intended to draw attention to the sex of the employee/student or can reasonably be interpreted to draw attention to the sex of the employee/student;
- Comments to the employee/student or others about the sexual conduct, capability, or desirability of an employee/student;
- Cat calls, whistles, or other conduct reasonably interpreted to be of a sexual nature.
- Sexually suggestive gestures are also prohibited.
- It is improper to subject employees/students to photographs, cartoons, articles, or other written or pictorial materials of a sexual nature after the employee/student has expressed his/her/hir displeasure with such activity. These materials may be offensive to the public as well and should not be on display in offices or public areas in any event.
- This policy is not intended to prohibit employees/students from asking other employees/students for social engagements. However, repeated requests where prior social invitations have been refused can be interpreted as sexual harassment. Employees/students should refrain from persistent invitations after an employee/student has indicated that such invitations are unwelcome.
POLICY EXPECTATIONS WITH RESPECT TO CONSENSUAL RELATIONSHIPS
There are inherent risks in any romantic or sexual relationship between individuals in unequal positions (such as faculty and student, supervisor and employee). These relationships may be less consensual than perceived by the individual whose position confers power. The relationship also may be viewed in different ways by each of the parties, particularly in retrospect. Furthermore, circumstances may change, and conduct that was previously welcome may become unwelcome. Even when both parties have consented at the outset to a romantic or sexual involvement, this past consent may not remove grounds for a later charge of a violation of applicable sections of this policy. The University does not wish to interfere with private choices regarding personal relationships when these relationships do not interfere with the goals and policies of the University. For the personal protection of members of this community, relationships in which power differentials are inherent (faculty-student, staff-student, administrator-student) are generally discouraged.
Consensual romantic or sexual relationships in which one party maintains a direct supervisory or evaluative role over the other party are unethical. Therefore, persons with direct supervisory or evaluative responsibilities who are involved in such relationships must bring those relationships to the timely attention of their supervisor, and will likely result in the necessity to remove the employee from the supervisory or evaluative responsibilities, or shift a party out of being supervised or evaluated by someone with whom they have established a consensual relationship. This includes Teaching Assistants and students over whom they have direct responsibility. While no relationships are prohibited by this policy, failure to self-report such relationships to a supervisor as required can result in disciplinary action for an employee.
c. Sexual Misconduct
State law defines various violent and/or non-consensual sexual acts as crimes. Additionally, Samuel Merritt University has defined categories of sexual misconduct, as stated below, for which action under this policy may be imposed. Generally speaking, the University considers Non-Consensual Sexual Intercourse violations to be the most serious, and therefore typically imposes the most severe sanctions, including suspension or expulsion for students and termination for employees. However, the University reserves the right to impose any level of sanction, ranging from a reprimand up to and including suspension or expulsion/termination, for any act of sexual misconduct or other gender-based offenses, including intimate partner or relationship (dating and/or domestic) violence, non-consensual sexual contact and stalking based on the facts and circumstances of the particular complaint. Acts of sexual misconduct may be committed by any person upon any other person, regardless of the sex, gender, sexual orientation and/or gender identity of those involved. Violations include:
- Sexual Harassment (as defined in section b above)
- Non-Consensual Sexual Intercourse
- any sexual penetration or intercourse (anal, oral or vaginal)
- however slight
- with any object
- by a person upon another person
- that is without consent and/or by force
Sexual penetration includes vaginal or anal penetration by a penis, tongue, finger or object, or oral copulation by mouth to genital contact or genital to mouth contact.
- Non-Consensual Sexual Contact
- any intentional sexual touching
- however slight
- with any object
- by a person upon another person
- that is without consent and/or by force
Sexual touching includes any bodily contact with the breasts, groin, genitals, mouth or other bodily orifice of another individual, or any other bodily contact in a sexual manner.
- Sexual Exploitation
Sexual Exploitation refers to a situation in which a person takes non-consensual or abusive sexual advantage of another, and situations in which the conduct does not fall within the definitions of Sexual Harassment, Non-Consensual Sexual Intercourse or Non-Consensual Sexual Contact. Examples of sexual exploitation include, but are not limited to:
- Sexual voyeurism (such as watching a person undressing, using the bathroom or engaged in sexual acts without the consent of the person observed)
- Taking pictures or video or audio recording another in a sexual act, or in any other private activity without the consent of all involved in the activity, or exceeding the boundaries of consent (such as allowing another person to hide in a closet and observe sexual activity, or disseminating sexual pictures without the photographed person’s consent)
- Sexual exploitation also includes engaging in sexual activity with another person while knowingly infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or other sexually transmitted disease (STD) and without informing the other person of the infection, and further includes administering alcohol or drugs (such as “date rape” drugs) to another person without his or her knowledge or consent
- Consent is informed and an affirmative, unambiguous, and conscious decision by each participant to engage in mutually agreed-upon sexual activity. For consent to be valid, there must be a clear expression in words or actions that the other individual consented to that specific sexual conduct.
- Consent is voluntary. It must be given without coercion, force, threats, or intimidation. Consent is an expression of free will.
- Consent in some form of sexual activity does not imply consent to other forms of sexual activity. Consent to sexual activity on one occasion is not consent to engage in sexual activity on another occasion. A current or previous dating or sexual relationship, by itself, is not sufficient to constitute consent. Even in the context of a relationship, there must be mutual consent to engage in sexual activity. Consent must be ongoing throughout a sexual encounter and can be revoked at any time. Once consent is withdrawn, the sexual activity must stop immediately.
- Consent cannot be given when a person is incapacitated. A person cannot consent if she/he/ze is under the influence of drugs, alcohol, or medication, unconscious or coming in and out of consciousness. An individual who engages in sexual activity when the individual knows, or should know, that the other person is physically or mentally incapacitated has violated this policy.
- It is not an excuse that the individual responding party of sexual misconduct was intoxicated and, therefore, did not realize the incapacity of the other.
- Incapacitation is defined as a state where someone cannot make rational, reasonable decisions because they lack the capacity to give knowing consent (e.g., to understand the “who, what, when, where, why or how” of their sexual interaction). This policy also covers a person whose incapacity results from mental disability, involuntary physical restraint and/or from the taking of incapacitating drugs.
- A person cannot consent if she/he/ze is under the threat of violence, bodily injury or other forms of coercion. A person cannot consent if his/her/hir understanding of the act is affected by a physical or mental impairment.
- In the evaluation of any allegation it is not a valid excuse to alleged lack of affirmative consent that the responding party believed that the Reporting Party consented to the sexual activity under either of the following circumstances:
- (A) The Responding Party’s belief in affirmative consent arose from the intoxication or recklessness of the accused.
- (B) The Responding Party did not take reasonable steps, in the circumstances known to the accused at the time, to ascertain whether the Reporting Party affirmatively consented.
- In The State of California a minor (meaning a person under the age of 18 years) cannot consent to sexual activity. This means that sexual contact by an adult with a person younger than 18 years old is a crime, as well as a violation of this policy, even if the minor wanted to engage in the act.
- Amanda and Bill meet at a party. They spend the evening dancing and getting to know each other. Bill convinces Amanda to come up to his room. From 11:00pm until 3:00am, Bill uses every line he can think of to convince Amanda to have sex with him, but she adamantly refuses. He keeps at her, and begins to question her religious convictions, and accuses her of being “a prude.” Finally, it seems to Bill that her resolve is weakening, and he convinces her to give him a "hand job" (hand to genital contact). Amanda would never had done it but for Bill's incessant advances. He feels that he successfully seduced her, and that she wanted to do it all along, but was playing shy and hard to get. Why else would she have come up to his room alone after the party? If she really didn't want it, she could have left. Bill is responsible for violating the University Non-Consensual or Forced Sexual Contact policy. It is likely that a University hearing board would find that the degree and duration of the pressure Bill applied to Amanda are unreasonable. Bill coerced Amanda into performing unwanted sexual touching upon him. Where sexual activity is coerced, it is forced. Consent is not effective when forced. Sex without effective consent is sexual misconduct.
- Jiang is a sophomore at the University. Beth is a freshman. Jiang comes to Beth’s dorm room with some mutual friends to watch a movie. Jiang and Beth, who have never met before, are attracted to each other. After the movie, everyone leaves, and Jiang and Beth are alone. They hit it off, and are soon becoming more intimate. They start to make out. Jiang verbally expresses his desire to have sex with Beth. Beth, who was abused by a baby-sitter when she was five, and has not had any sexual relations since, is shocked at how quickly things are progressing. As Jiang takes her by the wrist over to the bed, lays her down, undresses her, and begins to have intercourse with her, Beth has a severe flashback to her childhood trauma. She wants to tell Jiang to stop, but cannot. Beth is stiff and unresponsive during the intercourse. Is this a policy violation? Jiang would be held responsible in this scenario for Non Consensual Sexual Intercourse. It is the duty of the sexual initiator, Jiang, to make sure that he has mutually understandable consent to engage in sex. Though consent need not be verbal, it is the clearest form of consent. Here, Jiang had no verbal or non-verbal mutually understandable indication from Beth that she consented to sexual intercourse. Of course, wherever possible, students should attempt to be as clear as possible as to whether or not sexual contact is desired, but students must be aware that for psychological reasons, or because of alcohol or drug use, one’s partner may not be in a position to provide as clear an indication as the policy requires. As the policy makes clear, consent must be actively, not passively, given.
- Kevin and Amy are at a party. Kevin is not sure how much Amy has been drinking, but he is pretty sure it’s a lot. After the party, he walks Amy to her room, and Amy comes on to Kevin, initiating sexual activity. Kevin asks her if she is really up to this, and Amy says yes. Clothes go flying, and they end up in Amy’s bed. Suddenly, Amy runs for the bathroom. When she returns, her face is pale, and Kevin thinks she may have thrown up. Amy gets back into bed, and they begin to have sexual intercourse. Kevin is having a good time, though he can’t help but notice that Amy seems pretty groggy and passive, and he thinks Amy may have even passed out briefly during the sex, but he does not let that stop him. When Kevin runs into Amy the next day, he thanks her for the wild night. Amy remembers nothing, and decides to make a complaint to the Dean. This is a violation of the Non-Consensual Sexual Intercourse Policy. Kevin should have known that Amy was incapable of making a rational, reasonable decision about sex. Even if Amy seemed to consent, Kevin was well aware that Amy had consumed a large amount of alcohol, and Kevin thought Amy was physically ill, and that she passed out during sex. Kevin should be held accountable for taking advantage of Amy in her condition. This is not the level of respectful conduct expected of students.
4. Other Civil Rights Offenses, When the Act is Based Upon the Status of a Protected Class
- Threatening or causing physical harm, extreme verbal abuse or other conduct which threatens or endangers the health or safety of any person on the basis of their actual or perceived membership in a protected class
- Discrimination, defined as actions that deprive other members of the community of educational or employment access, benefits or opportunities on the basis of their actual or perceived membership in a protected class
- Intimidation, defined as implied threats or acts that cause an unreasonable fear of harm in another on the basis of actual or perceived membership in a protected class
- Hazing, defined as acts likely to cause physical or psychological harm or social ostracism to any person within the University community, when related to the admission, initiation, pledging, joining, or any other group-affiliation activity on the basis of actual or perceived membership in a protected class; hazing is also illegal under state law and prohibited by University policy
- Bullying, defined as
- Repeated and/or severe
- Aggressive behavior
- Likely to intimidate or intentionally hurt, control or diminish another person, physically or mentally
- That is not speech or conduct otherwise protected by the 1st Amendment.
- Violence between those in an intimate relationship to each other on the basis of actual or perceived membership in a protected class (this includes romantic relationships, dating, domestic and/or relationship violence)
- Stalking 1:
- A course of conduct
- Directed at a specific person
- On the basis of actual or perceived membership in a protected class
- That is unwelcome, AND
- Would cause a reasonable person to feel fear
- [Stalking 2:
- Repetitive and Menacing
- Pursuit, following, harassing and/or interfering with the peace and/or safety of another]
- Examples of Stalking:
- A student repeatedly shows up at another student's on-campus residence, always notifying the front desk attendant that they are there to see the resident. Upon a call to the resident, the student informs residence hall staff that this visitor is uninvited and continuously attempts to see them, even so far as waiting for them outside of classes and showing up to their on-campus place of employment requesting that they go out on a date together. Stalking 1.
- A graduate student working as an on-campus tutor received flowers and gifts delivered to their office. After learning the gifts were from a student they recently tutored, the graduate student thanked the student and stated that it was not necessary and would appreciate the gift deliveries to stop. The student then started leaving notes of love and gratitude on the graduate assistant's car, both on-campus and at home. Asked again to stop, the student stated by email: “You can ask me to stop, but I’m not giving up. We are meant to be together, and I’ll do anything necessary to make you have the feelings for me that I have for you.” When the tutor did not respond, the student emailed again, “You cannot escape me. I will track you to the ends of the earth. We are meant to be together.” Stalking 2.
- Stalking 1:
- Any other University rules, when a violation is motivated by the actual or perceived membership of the reporting party’s sex or gender or in a protected class, may be pursued using this policy and process when the violation results in a discriminatory deprivation of educational or employments rights, privileges, benefits and/or opportunities.
Sanctions for the above-listed “Other Civil Rights Behaviors” behaviors range from reprimand up through and including expulsion of students or termination of employees.
Retaliation is defined as any adverse action taken against a person participating in a protected activity because of their participation in that protected activity. Retaliation against an individual for alleging harassment, supporting a reporting party or for assisting in providing information relevant to a claim of harassment is a serious violation of University policy and will be treated as another possible instance of harassment or discrimination. Acts of alleged retaliation should be reported immediately to the Title IX Coordinator or to a deputy and will be promptly investigated. The University is prepared to take appropriate steps to protect individuals who fear that they may be subjected to retaliation.
6. Remedial Action
University will implement initial remedial and responsive and/or protective actions upon notice of alleged harassment, retaliation and/or discrimination. Such actions could include but are not limited to: no contact orders, providing counseling and/or medial services, academic support, living arrangement adjustments, providing a campus escort, academic or work schedule and assignment accommodations, transportation resources, safety planning, referral to campus and community support resources.
University will take additional prompt remedial and/or disciplinary action with respect to any member of the community, guest or visitor who has been found to engage in harassing or discriminatory behavior or retaliation. Procedures for handling reported incidents are fully described below. Deliberately false and/or malicious accusations of harassment, as opposed to reports which, even if erroneous, are made in good faith, are just as serious an offense as harassment and will be subject to appropriate disciplinary action.
7. Confidentiality and Reporting of Offenses Under This Policy
University officials, depending on their roles at the University, have varying reporting responsibilities and abilities to maintain confidentiality. In order to make informed choices, a reporting party should be aware of confidentiality and mandatory reporting requirements when consulting campus resources. On campus, some resources may maintain confidentiality, offering options and advice without any obligation to inform an outside agency or individual unless a reporting party has requested information to be shared. Other resources exist to report crimes and policy violations and these resources will take action when a reporting party shares notice of victimization with them. The following describes the reporting options at University:
- Confidential Reporting
If a reporting party would like the details of an incident to be kept confidential, the reporting party may speak with the University psychologist(s), student health service providers, off-campus local rape crisis counselors, domestic violence resources, local or state assistance agencies, or off-campus members of the clergy/chaplains who will maintain confidentiality except in extreme cases of immediacy of threat or danger or abuse of a minor. The Staff Psychologists and Family Nursing Practitioners in Student Health and Counseling (SHAC) and/or the Employee Assistance Program are available to help free of charge and can be seen on an emergency basis during normal business hours. These employees will submit anonymous statistical information for Clery Act purposes unless they believe it would be harmful to their client or patient.
- Formal Reporting Options
University employees have a duty to report, unless they fall under the section above. Parties making a report may want to consider carefully whether they share personally identifiable details with non-confidential employees, as those details must be shared by the employee with the Title IX Coordinator. Otherwise, employees must share all details of the reports they receive. If a reporting party does not wish for their name to be shared, does not wish for an investigation to take place, or does not want a formal resolution to be pursued, the reporting party may make such a request to the Title IX Coordinator, who will evaluate that request in light of the duty to ensure the safety of the campus and comply with federal law.
In cases indicating pattern, predation, weapons, threat and/or violence, the University will be unable to honor a request for confidentiality. In cases where the reporting party requests confidentiality and the circumstances allow the University to honor that request, the University will offer interim supports and remedies to the reporting party and the community, but will not otherwise pursue formal action. A reporting party has the right, and can expect, to have reports taken seriously by the University when formally reported, and to have those incidents investigated and properly resolved through these procedures. Formal reporting still affords privacy to the reporter, and only a small group of officials who need to know will be told, including but not limited to investigators, witnesses, the University President, select senior administrators and the responding party. The circle of people with this knowledge will be kept as tight as possible to preserve a reporting party’s rights and privacy. [Additionally anonymous reports can be made by victims and/or third parties. Note that these anonymous reports may prompt a need for the institution to investigate.
8. Federal Timely Warning Obligations
Reporting parties should be aware that University administrators must issue timely warnings for incidents reported to them that pose a substantial threat of bodily harm or danger to members of the campus community. The University will make every effort to ensure that a reporting party’s name and other identifying information is not disclosed, while still providing enough information for community members to make safety decisions in light of the potential danger.
RESOLUTION PROCESS FOR COMPLAINTS OF HARASSMENT, SEXUAL MISCONDUCT AND OTHER FORMS OF DISCRIMINATION
Samuel Merritt University will act on any formal or informal report or notice of violation of the policy on Equal Opportunity, Harassment and Nondiscrimination that is received by the Title IX Coordinator or any member of the administration.
The procedures described below will apply to all resolutions involving students, staff or faculty members with the exception that unionized or other categorized employees will be subject to the terms of their respective collective bargaining agreements/employees’ rights to the extent those agreements do not conflict with federal or state compliance obligations. Redress and requests for responsive actions for reports made about non-members of the community are also covered by these procedures.
1. Filing a Complaint
Any member of the community, guest or visitor who believes that the policy on Equal Opportunity, Harassment and Nondiscrimination has been violated should contact the Interim Title IX Coordinator. It is also possible for employees to notify a supervisor, or for students to notify an administrator or faculty member, or any member of the community may contact the Assistant Vice President for Enrollment and Student Services. These individuals will in turn notify the Interim Title IX Coordinator. The University website does not yet have a reporting form.
All employees receiving reports of a potential violation of University policy are expected to promptly contact the Interim Title IX Coordinator or designee, within 24 hours of becoming aware of a report or incident. All initial contacts will be treated with the maximum possible privacy. In all cases, University will give consideration to the reporting party with respect to how the resolution is pursued, but reserves the right, when necessary to protect the community, to investigate and pursue a resolution when the reporting party chooses not to initiate or participate in a formal resolution.
3. Resolution Intake
Normally within two business days of receipt of notice or a report, the Interim Title IX Coordinator  will make an initial determination as to whether a policy violation may have occurred and/or whether conflict resolution might be appropriate. If the report does not appear to allege a policy violation or if conflict resolution is desired by the reporting party, and appears appropriate given the nature of the alleged behavior, then the report does not proceed to investigation.
A full investigation will necessarily be pursued if there is evidence of a pattern of misconduct or a perceived threat of further harm to the community or any of its members. University aims to complete all investigations within a 60 calendar day time period, which can be extended as necessary for appropriate cause by the Interim Title IX Coordinator with notice to the parties.
The University’s resolution will not typically be altered or precluded on the grounds that civil or criminal charges involving the same incident have been filed or that charges have been dismissed or reduced. However, the University may undertake a short delay (several days to weeks) in its investigation or resolution process, to comply with a law enforcement request for cooperation (e.g.: to allow for criminal evidence collection) when criminal charges on the basis of the same behaviors that invoke this process are being investigated. The University will promptly resume its investigation and processes once notified by law enforcement that the initial evidence collection process is complete.
All parties are entitled to an advisor of their choosing to guide and accompany them throughout the resolution process. The advisor may be a friend, mentor, family member, attorney or any other supporter a party chooses to advise them. The parties may choose advisors from inside or outside the campus community.
The parties may be accompanied by their advisor in all meetings and interviews at which the party is entitled to be present, including intake and interviews. Advisors should help their advisees prepare for each meeting, and are expected to advise ethically, with integrity and in good faith. The University cannot guarantee equal advisory rights, meaning that if one party selects an advisor who is an attorney, but the other party does not, or cannot afford an attorney, the University is not obligated to provide one. Additionally, responding parties may wish to contact organizations such as:
- FACE (http://www.facecampusequality.org)
- SAVE (http://www.saveservices.org),
Reporting parties may wish to contact organizations such as:
- The Victim Rights Law Center (http://www.victimrights.org), or the
- The National Center for Victims of Crime (http://www.victimsofcrime.org), which maintains the Crime Victim’s Bar Association.
All advisors are subject to the same campus rules, whether they are attorneys or not. Advisors may not address campus officials in a meeting or interview unless invited to. Advisors may confer quietly with their advisees as necessary, as long as they do not disrupt the process. For longer or more involved discussions, the parties and their advisors should ask for breaks or step out of meetings to allow for private conversation. Advisors will typically be given an opportunity to meet in advance of any interview or meeting with the administrative officials conducting that interview or meeting. This pre-meeting will allow advisors to clarify any questions they may have, and allows the University an opportunity to clarify the role the advisor is expected to take.
Advisors are expected to refrain from interference with the University investigation and resolution. Any advisor who steps out of their role in any meeting under the campus resolution process will be warned once and only once. If the advisor continues to disrupt or otherwise fails to respect the limits of the advisor role, the advisor will be asked to leave the meeting. When an advisor is removed from a meeting, that meeting will typically continue without the advisor present. Subsequently, the Title IX Coordinator will determine whether the advisor may be reinstated, may be replaced by a different advisor, or whether the party will forfeit the right to an advisor for the remainder of the process.
The University expects that the parties will wish to share documentation related to the allegations with their advisors. The University provides a consent form that authorizes such sharing. The parties must complete this form before the University is able to share records with an advisor. Advisors are expected to maintain the privacy of the records shared with them. These records may not be shared with 3rd parties, disclosed publicly, or used for purposes not explicitly authorized by the University. The University may seek to restrict the role of any advisor who does not respect the sensitive nature of the process or who fails to abide by the University’s privacy expectations.
The University expects an advisor to adjust their schedule to allow them to attend University meetings when scheduled. The University does not typically change scheduled meetings to accommodate an advisor’s inability to attend. The University will, however, make provisions to allow an advisor who cannot attend in person to attend a meeting by telephone, video and/or virtual meeting technologies as may be convenient and available.
A party may elect to change advisors during the process, and is not locked into using the same advisor throughout.
If reporting party wishes to pursue a formal resolution or if University, based on the alleged policy violation, wishes to pursue a formal resolution, then the Interim Title IX Coordinator appoints a trained investigator(s) to conduct the investigation, usually within two business days of determining that a resolution should proceed. Investigations are completed expeditiously, normally within 10 business days of notice to the Interim Title IX Coordinator. Investigations may take longer when initial reports fail to provide direct first-hand information. The University may undertake a short delay (to allow evidence collection) when criminal charges on the basis of the same behaviors that invoke this process are being investigated. The University’s resolution will not be altered or precluded on the grounds that civil or criminal charges involving the same incident have been filed or that charges have been dismissed or reduced. All investigations will be thorough, reliable and impartial, prompt and fair and will entail interviews with all relevant parties and witnesses, obtaining available evidence and identifying sources of expert information, if necessary. At any point during the investigation, if it is determined there is no reasonable cause to believe that University policy has been violated, the Interim Title IX Coordinator has authority to terminate the investigation and end resolution proceedings.
Witnesses are expected to cooperate with and participate in the University’s investigation. Witnesses may provide written statements in lieu of interviews during the investigation and may be interviewed remotely by phone, Skype (or similar technology), if they cannot be interviewed in person.
5. Interim Remedies
If, in the judgment of the Interim Title IX Coordinator, the safety or well-being of any member(s) of the campus community may be jeopardized by the presence on-campus of the responding party or the ongoing activity of a student organization whose behavior is in question, the Title IX Coordinator may provide interim remedies intended to address the short-term effects of harassment, discrimination and/or retaliation, i.e., to redress harm to the reporting party and the community and to prevent further violations. These remedies may include referral to Student Health and Counseling (SHAC) or to the Employee Assistance Program, education to the community, altering the housing situation of the responding party or resident employee (or the reporting party, if desired), altering work arrangements for employees, providing campus escorts, implementing contact limitations between the parties, offering adjustments to academic deadlines, course schedules, etc.
The University may interim suspend a student, employee or organization pending the completion of investigation and procedures. In all cases in which an interim suspension is imposed, the student, employee or student organization will be given the opportunity to meet with the Title IX Coordinator prior to such suspension being imposed, or as soon thereafter as reasonably possible, to show cause why the suspension should not be implemented. The Title IX Coordinator has sole discretion to implement or stay an interim suspension under the policy on Equal Opportunity, Harassment and Nondiscrimination, and to determine its conditions and duration. Violation of an interim suspension under this policy will be grounds for expulsion or termination.
During an interim suspension or administrative leave, a student or employee may be denied access to the University campus/facilities/events. As determined by the Title IX Coordinator this restriction includes classes and/or all other University activities or privileges for which the student or employee might otherwise be eligible. At the discretion of the Title IX Coordinator alternative coursework or work options may be pursued to ensure as minimal an impact as possible on the responding party.
6. Resolution of Reported Misconduct
During or upon the completion of investigation, the Interim Title IX Coordinator will review the investigation, which may include meeting with the investigators. Based on that review, the Interim Title IX Coordinator will make a decision on whether there is reasonable cause to proceed with the resolution process.
If there is reasonable cause, the Interim Title IX Coordinator will direct the investigation to continue and the allegation will be resolved through one of three processes discussed briefly here and in greater detail below:
- Conflict Resolution – typically used for less serious offenses and only when both parties agree to conflict resolution
- Administrative Resolution – resolution by a trained administrator
The process followed is dictated by the preference of the parties. Conflict Resolution will only occur if selected by both parties, otherwise the Administrative Resolution Process applies.
If, following a review of the investigation, the Interim Title IX Coordinator decides by the preponderance of evidence that no policy violation has occurred, the process will end unless the reporting party requests that the Title IX Coordinator makes an extraordinary determination to re-open the investigation or to forward the matter for administrative resolution. This decision lies in the sole discretion of the Title IX Coordinator.
a. Conflict Resolution
Conflict resolution is often used for less serious, yet inappropriate, behaviors and is encouraged as an alternative to the formal investigation process to resolve conflicts. The Title IX Coordinator will determine if conflict resolution is appropriate, based on the willingness of the parties, the nature of the conduct at issue and the susceptibility of the conduct to conflict resolution. In a conflict resolution meeting, designated administrator(s) will facilitate a dialogue with the parties to an effective resolution, if possible. Sanctions are not possible as the result of a conflict resolution process, though the parties may agree to appropriate remedies. The Title IX Coordinator will keep records of any resolution that is reached, and failure to abide by the resolution can result in appropriate responsive actions.
Conflict resolution will not be the primary resolution mechanism used to address reports of sexual misconduct or violent behavior of any kind or in other cases of serious violations of policy, though it may be made available after the formal process is completed should the parties and the Title IX Coordinator believe that it could be beneficial. It is not necessary to pursue conflict resolution first in order to make a formal report and anyone participating in conflict resolution can stop that process at any time and request an administrative resolution.
Both parties will be notified of the outcome of Conflict Resolution, without undue delay between the notifications. Notification will be made in writing and may be delivered by one or more of the following methods: in person; mailed to the local or permanent address of the parties as indicated in official University records; or emailed to the parties’ University-issued email account. Once mailed, emailed and/or received in-person, notice will be presumptively delivered.
b. Administrative Resolution
Administrative Resolution can be pursued for any behavior that falls within the policy on Equal Opportunity, Harassment and Nondiscrimination, at any time during the process. The Title IX Coordinator will provide written notification to any member of University community who the responding party to an allegation of harassment, discrimination, or retaliation. Prior to meeting with University investigators, the parties will be provided with a written description of the alleged violation(s), a description of the applicable procedures and a statement of the potential sanctions/responsive actions that could result. This notice will include the time, date and location of the interview and a reminder that attendance is mandatory, superseding all other campus activities. If the responding party does not appear at the scheduled meeting, the meeting will be held in their absence.
The Administrative Resolution process consists of a prompt, thorough and impartial investigation, a finding on each of the alleged policy violations, and sanctions for findings of responsibility. Once the investigation described above is complete, the Title IX Coordinator will meet with the responding party to review the findings and the investigation report. The responding party may bring an advisor of their choosing to the meeting. The responding party may elect not to attend or participate, but the Administrative Resolution will proceed regardless.
During the meeting, the Title IX Coordinator review the investigation report with the responding party and will render a finding utilizing the preponderance of the evidence standard, based on the information provided by the investigation. The Title IX Coordinator in consultation as appropriate, will also determine appropriate sanctions or remedial actions.
The Title IX Coordinator will prepare a written report detailing the finding, the information supporting that finding and any information excluded from consideration and why. This report typically does not exceed two pages in length.
The Title IX Coordinator will inform the responding party and the reporting party of the final determination in writing within 3 business days of the Administrative Resolution. The final determination letter, incorporating the report described above, will be made in writing and will be delivered either:
- In person, or
- Mailed to the local address of the respective party as indicated in official University records. If there is no local address on file, mail will be sent to the party’s permanent address.
- Emailed to the SMU email address of the respective parties
Where the responding party is found not responsible for the alleged violation(s), the investigation will be closed. Where a violation is found, the University will act to end the discrimination, prevent its recurrence, and remedy its effects on the victim and the university community. In cases involving sexual misconduct, sexual harassment, stalking and/or intimate partner violence, the written notification includes the finding, any resulting responsive actions, and the rationale for the decision. This written notification of final decision is delivered to the parties without undue delay between the notifications, and is considered a final determination. No appeal is provided.
Factors considered when determining a sanction/responsive action may include:
- The nature, severity of, and circumstances surrounding the violation
- An individual’s disciplinary history
- Previous reports or allegations involving similar conduct
- Any other information deemed relevant in the Administrative Resolution.
- The need for sanctions/responsive actions to bring an end to the discrimination, harassment and/or retaliation
- The need for sanctions/responsive actions to prevent the future recurrence of discrimination, harassment and/or retaliation
- The need to remedy the effects of the discrimination, harassment and/or retaliation on the reporting party and the community
i. Student Sanctions
The following are the usual sanctions that may be imposed upon students or organizations singly or in combination:
- Warning: A formal statement that the behavior was unacceptable and a warning that further infractions of any University policy, procedure or directive will result in more severe sanctions/responsive actions.
- Probation: A written reprimand for violation of the Code of Student Conduct, providing for more severe disciplinary sanctions in the event that the student or organization is found in violation of any University policy, procedure or directive within a specified period of time. Terms of the probation will be specified and may include denial of specified social privileges, exclusion from co-curricular activities, non-contact orders and/or other measures deemed appropriate.
- Suspension: Termination of student status for a definite period of time not to exceed two years, and/or until specific criteria are met. Students who return from suspension are automatically placed on probation through the remainder of their tenure at University.
- Expulsion: Permanent termination of student status, revocation of rights to be on campus for any reason or attend University-sponsored events.
- Withholding Diploma. University may withhold a student's diploma for a specified period of time and/or deny a student participation in commencement activities if the student has a complaint pending, or as a sanction if the student is found responsible for an alleged violation.
- Revocation of Degree. University reserves the right to revoke a degree awarded from University for fraud, misrepresentation or other violation of University policies, procedures or directives in obtaining the degree, or for other serious violations committed by a student prior to graduation.
- Organizational Sanctions. Deactivation, de-recognition, loss of all privileges (including University registration), for a specified period of time.
- Other Actions: In addition to or in place of the above sanctions, University may assign any other sanctions as deemed appropriate.
ii. Employee Discipline
Responsive actions for an employee who has engaged in harassment, discrimination and/or retaliation include warning, required counseling, demotion, suspension with pay, suspension without pay and termination.
f. Withdrawal or Resignation While Charges Pending
Students: Should a student decide to leave and not participate in the investigation and/or hearing, the process will nonetheless proceed in the student’s absence to a reasonable resolution and that student will not be permitted to return to the University unless all sanctions have been satisfied.
Employees: Should an employee resign while charges are pending, the records of the Title IX Coordinator will reflect that status, as will University responses to any future inquiries regarding employment references for that individual. The Title IX Coordinator will act to promptly and effectively remedy the effects of the conduct upon the reporting party and the community.
h. Failure to Complete Sanctions/Comply with Discipline
All responding parties are expected to comply with conduct sanctions/discipline/corrective actions within the time frame specified by the Title IX Coordinator. Failure to follow through on conduct sanctions/discipline/corrective actions by the date specified, whether by refusal, neglect or any other reason, may result in additional sanctions/discipline/corrective actions and/or suspension, expulsion and/or termination from University and may be noted on a student’s official transcript. A suspension will only be lifted when compliance is achieved to the satisfaction of the Title IX Coordinator.
In implementing this policy, records of all allegations, investigations, and resolutions will be kept by the Title IX Coordinator.
j. Statement of the Rights of the Parties
Statement of the Reporting Party’s rights:
- The right to investigation and appropriate resolution of all credible reports or notice of sexual misconduct or discrimination made in good faith to university officials;
- The right to be informed in advance of any public release of information regarding the incident;
- The right of the reporting party not to have any personally identifiable information released to the public, without his or her consent.
- The right to be treated with respect by university officials;
- The right to have university policies and procedures followed without material deviation;
- The right not to be pressured to mediate or otherwise informally resolve any reported misconduct involving violence, including sexual violence.
- The right not to be discouraged by university officials from reporting sexual misconduct or discrimination to both on-campus and off-campus authorities.
- The right to be informed by university officials of options to notify proper law enforcement authorities, including on-campus and local police, and the option to be assisted by campus authorities in notifying such authorities, if the student so chooses. This also includes the right not to report, if this is the victim’s desire;
- The right to have reports of sexual misconduct responded to promptly and with sensitivity by campus law enforcement and other campus officials.
- The right to be notified of available counseling, mental health, victim advocacy, health, legal assistance, student financial aid, visa and immigration assistance, or other student services for victims of sexual assault, both on campus and in the community;
- The right to a campus no contact order (or a trespass order against a non-affiliated 3rd party) when someone has engaged in or threatens to engage in stalking, threatening, harassing or other improper behavior that presents a danger to the welfare of the reporting party or others;
- The right to notification of and options for, and available assistance in, changing academic and living situations after an alleged sexual misconduct incident, if so requested by the victim and if such changes are reasonably available (no formal report, or investigation, campus or criminal, need occur before this option is available). Accommodations may include:
- Exam (paper, assignment) rescheduling;
- Taking an incomplete in a class;
- Transferring class sections;
- Temporary withdrawal;
- Alternative course completion options.
- The right to have the institution maintain such accommodations for as long as is necessary, and for protective measures to remain confidential, provided confidentiality does not impair the institution’s ability to provide the accommodations or protective measures.
- The right to be fully informed of campus policies and procedures as well as the nature and extent of all alleged violations contained within the report;
- The right to ask the investigators to identify and question relevant witnesses, including expert witnesses;
- The right to be informed of the names of all witnesses who will be called to give testimony, at least two business day prior to the hearing, except in cases where a witness’ identity will not be revealed to the responding party for compelling safety reasons (this does not include the name of the alleged victim/reporting party, which will always be revealed);
- The right not to have irrelevant prior sexual history admitted as evidence in the resolution process;
- The right to regular updates on the status of the investigation and/or resolution.
- The right to have reports heard by investigators who have received at least eight hours of annual sexual misconduct training;
- The right to preservation of privacy, to the extent possible and permitted by law;
- The right to meetings, interviews that are closed to the public;
- The right to petition that any investigator be recused on the basis of demonstrated bias;
- The right to bring a victim advocate or advisor of the reporting party’s choosing to all phases of the investigation and resolution proceeding;
- The right to provide evidence by means other than being in the same room with the responding party;
- The right to make or provide an impact statement in person or in writing to the investigators following determination of responsibility, but prior to sanctioning;
- The right to be informed of the outcome and sanction of the resolution process in writing, without undue delay between the notifications to the parties, and usually within 1 business day of the end of the process;
- The right to be informed in writing of when a decision of the university is considered final, any changes to the sanction to occur before the decision is finalized, to be informed of the finding and sanction of the resolution process;
- The right of the Reporting Party or any witness in an investigation of sexual assault, domestic violence, dating violence, or stalking not to be subject to disciplinary sanctions for a violation of the University’s student conduct policy at or near the time of the incident, unless the institution determines that the violation was egregious, including, but not limited to, an action that places the health or safety of any other person at risk or involves plagiarism, cheating, or academic dishonesty.
Statement of the Responding Party’s rights:
The rights of the responding party should also be prominently indicated. These should include, among others particular to your university:
- The right to investigation and appropriate resolution of all credible reports of sexual misconduct made in good faith to university administrators;
- The right to be informed in advance, when possible, of any public release of information regarding the report.
- The right to be treated with respect by university officials;
- The right to have university policies and procedures followed without material deviation;
- The right to be informed of and have access to campus resources for medical, health, counseling, and advisory services;
- The right to be fully informed of the nature, policies and procedures of the campus resolution process and to timely written notice of all alleged violations within the report, including the nature of the violation and possible sanctions;
- The right to a hearing on the report, including timely notice of the hearing date, and adequate time for preparation;
- The right to be informed of the names of all witnesses who will be interviewed, except in cases where a witness’ identity will not be revealed to the responding party for compelling safety reasons (this does not include the name of the reporting party, which will always be revealed);
- The right not to have irrelevant prior sexual history admitted as evidence in a campus resolution process;
- The right to have reports addressed by investigators who have received at least 8 hours of annual training;
- The right to petition that any investigator be recused on the basis of demonstrated bias;
- The right to meetings and interviews that are closed to the public;
- The right to have an advisor of their choice to accompany and assist in the campus resolution process.
- The right to a fundamentally fair resolution, as defined in these procedures;
- The right to make or provide an impact statement in person or in writing to the investigators following any determination of responsibility, but prior to sanctioning;
- The right to a decision based solely on evidence presented during the resolution process. Such evidence shall be credible, relevant, based in fact, and without prejudice;
- The right to be informed of the outcome and sanction of the resolution process in writing, without undue delay between the notifications to the parties, and usually within 1 business day of the end of the process;
- The right to be informed in writing of when a decision of the university is considered final, any changes to the sanction to occur before the decision is finalized, to be informed of the finding and sanction of the resolution process.
8. Disabilities Accommodation in the Equity Resolution Process
Samuel Merritt University is committed to providing qualified students, employees or others with disabilities with reasonable accommodations and support needed to ensure equal access to the Equity Resolution Process at the University. Anyone requesting such accommodations or support should contact the Director of the Disability Resource Center, who will review the request and, in consultation with the person requesting the accommodation, as well as the person coordinating the Equity Resolution Process, will determine which accommodations are appropriate and necessary for full participation.
These policies and procedures will be reviewed and updated annually by the Interim Title IX Coordinator. The Interim Title IX Coordinator may make minor modifications to procedure that do not materially jeopardize the fairness owed to any party. However, the Interim Title IX Coordinator may also vary procedures materially with notice (on the institutional web site, with appropriate date of effect identified) upon determining that changes to law or regulation require policy or procedural alterations not reflected in this policy and procedure. Procedures in effect at the time of its implementation will apply. Policy in effect at the time of the offense will apply even if the policy is changed subsequently, unless the parties consent to be bound by the current policy.
This policy and procedure was implemented in July 2015; It was reviewed by the Title IX Coordinator in July of 2016, 2017, 2018, and 2019.
 The responding party is the term used by the University to refer to the person accused of a policy violation. The University refers to the person bringing an accusation as the reporting party and is meant to reference the victim or complainant as the injured/harmed party.
 This definition of hostile environment is based on Federal Register / Vol. 59, No. 47 / Thursday, March 10, 1994: Department Of Education Office For Civil Rights, Racial Incidents And Harassment Against Students At Educational Institutions Investigative Guidance. The document is available at http://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/race394.html.
 Also of relevance is the Office of Civil Rights 2001 statement on sexual harassment, “Revised Sexual Harassment Guidance: Harassment Of Students By School Employees, Other Students, Or Third Parties, Title IX,” which can be found at http://www2.ed.gov/legislation/FedRegister/other/2001-1/011901b.html, as well as the April, 2011 Dear Colleague Letter on Campus Sexual Violence, which can be found at: http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/dear_colleague_sexual_violence.pdf
 Some examples of possible Sexual Harassment include:
- A faculty member insists that a student have sex with him/her in exchange for a good grade. This is harassment regardless of whether the student accedes to the request.
- A student repeatedly sends sexually oriented jokes around on an email list s/he created, even when asked to stop, causing one recipient to avoid the sender on campus and in the residence hall in which they both live.
- Explicit sexual pictures are displayed in an instructor’s office or on the exterior of a door
- Two supervisors frequently ‘rate’ several employees’ bodies and sex , commenting suggestively about their clothing and appearance.
- An instructor engages students in her class in discussions about their past sexual experiences, yet the conversation is not in any way germane to the subject matter of the class. She probes for explicit details, and demands that students answer her, though they are clearly uncomfortable and hesitant.
- An ex-girlfriend widely spreads false stories about her sex life with her former boyfriend to the clear discomfort of the boyfriend, turning him into a social pariah on campus
- Male students take to calling a particular brunette student “Monica” because of her resemblance to Monica Lewinsky. Soon, everyone adopts this nickname for her, and she is the target of relentless remarks about cigars, the president, “sexual relations” and Weight Watchers.
- A student grabbed another student by the hair, then grabbed her breast and put his mouth on it. While this is sexual harassment, it is also a form of sexual violence.
 This section is offered as an optional inclusion, as some campuses prefer to include this policy elsewhere, such as a faculty handbook and student handbook. We include it here to inform students, not just employees, of our expectations.
 The state definition of sexual assault is found at http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/calawquery?codesection=pen, which is applicable to criminal prosecutions for sexual assault in California, but may differ from the definition used by University to address policy violations.
 The state definition of consent can be found at http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/calawquery?codesection=pen, which is applicable to criminal prosecutions for sex offenses in California, but may differ from the definition used by University to address policy violations.
 We recommend incorporation of examples into policy as an educational and preventive tool. Some campuses may prefer to break these out into separate documents or resources.
 The state definition of domestic violence is found at http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/calawquery?codesection=pen , which is applicable to criminal prosecutions for domestic violence in California, but may differ from the definition used by University to address policy violations. [Included for VAWA Section 304 compliance purposes]
- Employee A has been in an intimate relationship with Employee B for over a year; Employee A punches Employee B in the face during an argument (Dating Violence).
- Student A has been in an intimate relationship with Student B for over a year; Students A & B live together. During an argument, Student A shoves Student B to the ground (Domestic Violence).
 The state definition of stalking can be found a http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/calawquery?codesection=pen, which is applicable to criminal prosecutions for stalking in California, but may differ from the definition used by University to address policy violations. [Included for VAWA Section 304 compliance purposes.]
 If circumstances require, the President or Title IX Coordinator may designate another person to oversee the process below, should a report be made involving the Coordinator or if the Coordinator is otherwise unavailable or unable to fulfill their duties.
Samuel Merritt University recognizes that any student whose conduct (academic or behavioral/ethical) results in sanctions has the right to participate in a fair and impartial grievance process.
Samuel Merritt University (SMU) provides a process by which student grievances are managed and resolved. The procedures below must be used by grievants who are enrolled as students of the University. Grievances cannot be filed on behalf of another person.
This policy does not apply to grievances involving claims or violations under the Equal Opportunity, Harassment and Nondiscrimination Policy.
Process and Procedures
Students shall make good faith efforts to resolve grievances with those directly involved, within 5 (five) working days after the event(s).
If the grievance is not resolved following Step 1 within (5) five working days of the event(s), the student may submit the grievance to the highest academic or administrative officer (hereinafter called “Step 2 Officer”) of the school (Dean), department (Chair), or program (Director), in which the student is enrolled. Such submission shall be in writing. The Step 2 Officer will provide the student with any applicable internal grievance procedure (required by the department or school) and attempt to achieve a satisfactory resolution of the grievance. A written decision by the academic or administrative officer shall be provided within a reasonable period of time and presented to the appropriate parties to the grievance.
If a decision adverse to the student is made, the student may accept the terms of the decision and comply with its conditions or the student may request a review of the decision by the Student Grievance Committee (SGC). A request for review by the SGC must be submitted in writing to either the Academic Vice President or the Vice President of Enrollment and Student Services by the student within five (5) working days of the Step 2 Officer’s decision.
If the issue involves an academic matter, the written grievance shall be submitted by the student to the Academic Vice President. If the issue involves a disciplinary matter, that is wholly unrelated to any academic matter, the written grievance shall be submitted by the student to the Vice President of Enrollment and Student Services and a copy shall also be provided to the Academic Vice President. If the Academic Vice President, in his or her sole discretion, determines that the grievance is related to Academic Matters, the Academic Vice President shall retain jurisdiction over the grievance to its conclusion.
The request for review by the student shall be in writing and contain:
A statement of the reason(s) for the request;
Identification of the University policies or regulations alleged to have been violated, if any;
All documents the student wants the SGC to consider, and
No supplemental filing of documents or materials shall be permitted unless requested by the SGC.
Within five (5) working days of receipt of the request for review, the jurisdictional Vice President shall request all pertinent documentation from the Step 2 Officer and insure that the grievant and parties involved in the grievance are given an opportunity to review a complete set of these documents. Documents will be made available for supervised review in the office of the respective Vice President and may not be removed, copied, or transcribed in any manner.
The respective Vice President shall record the notification of grievance and may at his or her discretion, forward all pertinent written information to the SGC Chair for the Committee’s review and recommendation.
Scope. Grievances relating to academic matters include academic, classroom/clinical behavior, or any circumstances that occur within the learning environment are under the final jurisdiction of the Academic Vice President. Didactic grading, assessment of clinical performance, policies related to matriculation or failure to meet the program’s technical standards are not subject to grievance review, unless the student can demonstrate evidence of failure by the institution to follow department/University policy/procedure, evidence of discrimination, or evidence that the student has not violated standards of academic integrity or professionalism.
Scope. Grievances related to disciplinary matters outside of the classroom or clinical setting which are unrelated to academic matters are under the final jurisdiction of the Vice President of Enrollment and Student Services and may include acts of intimidation/physical aggression, or violation in any of the following: non-academic student rights, code of ethics, code of conduct, and issues of accommodation related to Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990 as amended by the ADA Amendments Act (ADAAA) of 2008.
Grievance Review Process and Meeting
The SGC Chair shall select a meeting date occurring within a reasonable time after the filing of the request for review. The SGC shall have full discretion regarding the conduct of the review including any additional information to be received. In all cases, the grievant will be provided an opportunity to review all available documents and meet with the SGC.
The Committee shall deliberate and render its recommendation within a reasonable time to the appropriate Vice President. A valid recommendation will constitute a simple majority of the SGC.
The decision of the SGC on a request for review of a grievance shall be limited to the following recommendations.
Dismissal of the grievance;
Recommendation that the University uphold the decision of the academic program or Step 2 Officer;
Recommendation that the program reconsider its decision due to substantial evidence of discrimination or failure at the program level to follow standard policies and procedures;
Recommendation to the appropriate Vice President, that the program’s decision be reversed based on stated grounds.
Decisions to uphold probation, suspension or dismissal shall be posted on the student’s academic record.
The appropriate Vice President shall review the SGC’s recommended decision and within a reasonable period of time provide written notice of an approval, disapproval or modification of the SGC recommendation. The Vice President has the right to extend this review period to accommodate further review with written notification to the parties involved. The written decision will be distributed by the Vice President to the grievant(s) and the administrative (Step 2) officer of the program in which the student is enrolled.
In cases involving recommendation of suspension or dismissal, and the Vice President disapproves such recommendation; they shall provide written notice to the SGC of that decision, including the reason for disapproval prior to notification of the grievant. The SGC Chair may request a meeting with the SGC and the Vice President to resolve differences. If such differences are not resolved the decision of the Vice President shall be final.
Any action resulting in dismissal or suspension of the grievant from the University is subject to review and approval of the Vice President under whose jurisdiction the grievance rests. The decision of the Vice President is considered final.
A student suspended or dismissed from the University under the graduate and undergraduate progression and graduation policies and who is involved in the grievance process outlined in this catalog and student handbook will be allowed to register for non-clinical classes in the semester immediately following the ruling while his/her appeal is being heard. This policy does not apply to students whose next semester involves only clinical courses as defined by the program.
The student, if otherwise eligible, will be allowed to collect financial aid and will be required to pay tuition as any regularly registered student. If applicable, the student’s refund will be held on account until the grievance is resolved.
If the dismissal is upheld, the effective date will be the end of the previous term. Any financial aid refunds will be retained by the University until the decision has been made. At that point, all eligible financial aid will be returned to the appropriate financial aid agency.
If the dismissal is overturned, any financial aid refunds will be processed.
If, at the end of the grievance procedure, the appeal is denied (upholding the suspension or dismissal from the University), the student’s registration status will be revoked and the student will be suspended or dismissed.
If, at the end of the grievance procedure, the appeal is upheld (overturning the suspension or dismissal) the registrar will return the student to a regular registration status.